Haltiwanger v. Charlotte Amusement Co.
Haltiwanger v. Charlotte Amusement Co.
261 N.C. 180; 134 S.E.2d 198; 1964 N.C. LEXIS 438
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Davison-Paxon Co. v. Archer (Ga. Ct. App. 1954)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff’s sole assignment of error brought forward and set out in her -brief is the -failure of the court to- -comply with the provisions of G.S. 1-180. The'facts -are not -complicated. We have examined the charge in its entirety and sufficient prejudicial error has not (been made to appear therein to justify a new trial.
The verdict and judgment below will be upheld.
No error.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.