State v. Bailey

Supreme Court of North Carolina
State v. Bailey, 261 N.C. 783 (N.C. 1964)
136 S.E.2d 37; 1964 N.C. LEXIS 560

State v. Bailey

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The' evidence is sufficient to withstand defendant’s motion for nonsuit. G.S. 15-173. When considered contextually the charge of the court complies with G.S. 1-180. Applicable principles of law were explained to the jury in a substantially correct manner. State v. Phillips, 256 N.C. 445, 124 S.E. 2d 146; State v. Jestes, 185 N.C. 735, 117 S.E. 385; State v. Peterson, 129 N.C. 556, 40 S.E. 9. We find from the record no error sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial.

No error.

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE v. HENDERSON BAILEY
Status
Published