Jones v. Myrtle Desk Company
Cases that cite this one
58 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Demery v. Perdue Farms, Inc. (N.C. Ct. App. 2001)
- Clark v. ITT Grinnell Industrial Piping, Inc. (N.C. Ct. App. 2000)
- Coston v. SMITHFIELD PACKING, INC. (N.C. Ct. App. 2008)
- Hassell v. Onslow County Board of Education (N.C. 2008)
- Renfro v. Richardson Sports Ltd. Partners (N.C. Ct. App. 2005)
- McRae v. Toastmaster, Inc. (N.C. 2004)
- Barbour v. Regis Corp. (N.C. Ct. App. 2004)
- Edmonds v. Fresenius Medical Care (N.C. Ct. App. 2004)
- Poole v. Tammy Lynn Center (N.C. Ct. App. 2002)
- Deese v. Champion International Corp. (N.C. 2000)
- Timmons v. North Carolina Department of Transportation (N.C. 1999)
- Adams v. AVX Corp. (N.C. 1998)
- Derebery v. Pitt County Fire Marshall (N.C. 1986)
- Peoples v. Cone Mills Corp. (N.C. 1986)
- Nay v. Cornerstone Staffing Sols. (N.C. 2022)
- Nay v. Cornerstone Staffing Sols. (N.C. 2022)
- Stippich v. Reese's Transit, Inc. (N.C. Ct. App. 2018)
- Bishop v. Ingles Markets, Inc. (N.C. Ct. App. 2014)
- Cooper v. BHT ENTERPRISES (N.C. Ct. App. 2009)
- Billings v. General Parts, Inc. (N.C. Ct. App. 2007)
- Jones v. Wilson Stores (North Carolina Industrial Commission 2002)
- Hill v. the Summit (North Carolina Industrial Commission 2002)
- Russos v. Wheaton Industries (N.C. Ct. App. 2001)
- Lee v. F. M. Henderson & Associates (N.C. Ct. App. 1973)
- Brewer v. Rent-A-Ctr. (N.C. Ct. App. 2023)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Counsel for plaintiff has presented the contentions of his client, both as to the facts and law, with thoroughness, force and competency. These contentions have been fully considered in our review of the record. However, we find nothing which justifies a remand of the cause or a reversal of the judgment below. Review in Supreme Court is limited to questions of law and legal inference. The findings of fact of the Industrial Commission are conclusive on appeal when supported by competent evidence, even though there be evidence that would support findings to the contrary. The record in this case contains competent supporting evidence for each finding of fact. The findings are positive and cover all crucial facts upon which the right to compensation depends. The facts found support the conclusion that plaintiff’s injury did not arise out of and in the course of his employment with defendant employer. Bell v. Dewey Brothers, Inc., 236 N.C. 280, 72 S.E. 2d 680.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.