Crawford v. Central Bonded Warehouse
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Crawford v. Central Bonded Warehouse, 140 S.E.2d 548 (N.C. 1965)
263 N.C. 826; 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1384
Per Curiam
Crawford v. Central Bonded Warehouse
Opinion
The facts found by the Commission are supported by competent evidence. G.S. 97-86. These findings of fact are conclusive on appeal even though there may be evidence contra. Taylor v. Twin City Club, 260 N.C. 435, 132 S.E. 2d 865. The findings of fact support the conclusions and the Opinion and Award of the Full Commission. Where an idiopathic condition of a workman is the sole cause of the injury, compensation may not be awarded. Cole v. Guilford County, 259 N.C. 724, 131 S.E. 2d 308.
Affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- CLARENCE CRAWFORD, Employee v. CENTRAL BONDED WAREHOUSE, DIVISION OF BAYSIDE WAREHOUSE COMPANY, Employer and PHOENIX ASSURANCE OF NEW YORK, Carrier
- Cited By
- 7 cases
- Status
- Published