Crawford v. Central Bonded Warehouse

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Crawford v. Central Bonded Warehouse, 140 S.E.2d 548 (N.C. 1965)
263 N.C. 826; 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1384
Per Curiam

Crawford v. Central Bonded Warehouse

Opinion

PeR Cuexam.

The facts found by the Commission are supported by competent evidence. G.S. 97-86. These findings of fact are conclusive on appeal even though there may be evidence contra. Taylor v. Twin City Club, 260 N.C. 435, 132 S.E. 2d 865. The findings of fact support the conclusions and the Opinion and Award of the Full Commission. Where an idiopathic condition of a workman is the sole cause of the injury, compensation may not be awarded. Cole v. Guilford County, 259 N.C. 724, 131 S.E. 2d 308.

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
CLARENCE CRAWFORD, Employee v. CENTRAL BONDED WAREHOUSE, DIVISION OF BAYSIDE WAREHOUSE COMPANY, Employer and PHOENIX ASSURANCE OF NEW YORK, Carrier
Cited By
7 cases
Status
Published