State v. Fesperman
State v. Fesperman
264 N.C. 168; 141 S.E.2d 252; 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1143
State v. Fesperman
Opinion of the Court
On authority of S. v. Hord, ante 149, we hold that a duly appointed policeman of the City of Charlotte, North Carolina, is an officer of said City within the meaning of G.S. 14-230.
The ruling of the court below, quashing these bills of indictment, will be upheld for the reasons stated in the case of S. v. Stogner, filed this day, ante 163.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.