State v. Fesperman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
State v. Fesperman, 264 N.C. 168 (N.C. 1965)
141 S.E.2d 252; 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1143
Cüriam
State v. Fesperman
Opinion of the Court
On authority of S. v. Hord, ante 149, we hold that a duly appointed policeman of the City of Charlotte, North Carolina, is an officer of said City within the meaning of G.S. 14-230.
The ruling of the court below, quashing these bills of indictment, will be upheld for the reasons stated in the case of S. v. Stogner, filed this day, ante 163.
Affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. EARL FESPERMAN
- Status
- Published