Dull v. Dull
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Khajanchi v. Khajanchi (N.C. Ct. App. 2000)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The appellant did not except to the facts found by the court below, and the findings of fact are sufficient to support the order entered below. Goldsboro v. R. R., 246 N.C. 101, 97 S.E. 2d 486. Where no exceptions have been taken to the findings of fact, such findings are presumed to be correct and are binding on appeal. Goldsboro v. R. R., supra, and cited cases.
Orders for the support of minor children are subject to modification upon a proper showing of a change of conditions. Blankenship v. Blankenship, 256 N.C. 638, 124 S.E. 2d 857; Griffin v. Griffin, 237 N.C. 404, 75 S.E. 2d 133; Hardee v. Mitchell, 230 N.C. 40, 51 S.E. 2d 884.
The judgment from which this appeal was taken is
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.