Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1966

State v. Williams

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided October 12, 1966 · Per Curiam

150 S.E.2d 447; 268 N.C. 295; 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1187 (South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

16 later published cases cite this decision.

State v. Wilson (N.C. 1976)
State v. Bumgarner (N.C. 1973)
State v. Copeland (N.C. 1973)
State v. Johnson (N.C. 1973)
State v. Dixon (N.C. 1973)
State v. McLean (N.C. 1972)
State v. Hudson (N.C. 1972)
State v. Ingram (N.C. 1972)
State v. Harris (N.C. 1971)
State v. Mason (N.C. 1971)
State v. High (N.C. 1971)
State v. Smith (N.C. 1971)
State v. McIlwain (N.C. 1971)
State v. Witherspoon (N.C. 1971)
State v. Sherman (N.C. Ct. App. 1971)
State v. Higgs (N.C. 1967)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

No assignments of error appear in the record or briefs filed in this Court as required by Rule 19(3), Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court. “Therefore, unless error appears on the face of the record proper, or the issues are insufficient to support the judgment entered, the judgment will be sustained.” Trust Co. v. Henry, 267 N.C. 253, 148 S.E. 2d 7. See Bank v. Bryant, 257 N.C. 42, 125 S.E. 2d 291; Milling Co. v. Laws, 242 N.C. 505, 87 S.E. 2d 925; Smith v. Smith, 242 N.C. 646, 89 S.E. 2d 255; Hobbs v. Hobbs, 218 N.C. 468, 11 S.E. 2d 311.

We have examined the record proper, and find

No error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.