Scott v. Trogdon

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Scott v. Trogdon, 151 S.E.2d 18 (N.C. 1966)
268 N.C. 574; 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1263
Per Curiam

Scott v. Trogdon

Opinion

Per Curiam.

“(W)hen a trial court sets aside a verdict in its discretion, as here, its action in so doing is not subject to review by appeal to the Supreme Court, in the absence of a manifest abuse of discretion. Walston v. Greene, 246 N.C. 617, 99 S.E. 2d 805; Veazey v. Durham, 231 N.C. 357, 57 S.E. 2d 377; Goodman v. Goodman, 201 N.C. 808, 161 S.E. 686; Bird v. Bradburn, 131 N.C. 488, 42 S.E. 936; Brink v. Black, 74 N.C. 329.” Goldston v. Wright, 257 N.C. 279, 125 S.E. 2d 462.

Here, as in Goldston, the record discloses no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court. The appeal is without substance and will be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Reference

Full Case Name
James Wayman Scott, Sr. v. Earl Walton Trogdon, Jr.
Cited By
7 cases
Status
Published