Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1966

Scott v. Trogdon

Scott v. Trogdon
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided November 23, 1966 · Per Curiam
151 S.E.2d 18; 268 N.C. 574; 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1263 (South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Scott v. Trogdon

Opinion

Per Curiam.

“(W)hen a trial court sets aside a verdict in its discretion, as here, its action in so doing is not subject to review by appeal to the Supreme Court, in the absence of a manifest abuse of discretion. Walston v. Greene, 246 N.C. 617, 99 S.E. 2d 805; Veazey v. Durham, 231 N.C. 357, 57 S.E. 2d 377; Goodman v. Goodman, 201 N.C. 808, 161 S.E. 686; Bird v. Bradburn, 131 N.C. 488, 42 S.E. 936; Brink v. Black, 74 N.C. 329.” Goldston v. Wright, 257 N.C. 279, 125 S.E. 2d 462.

Here, as in Goldston, the record discloses no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court. The appeal is without substance and will be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.