Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1966

State v. Stinson

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided June 16, 1966 · Moore

148 S.E.2d 593; 267 N.C. 661; 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1105 (South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

15 later published cases cite this decision.

State v. Miller (N.C. 1975)
State v. Stepney (N.C. 1972)
State v. Dameron (N.C. Ct. App. 1972)
State v. Horner (N.C. 1984)
State v. Williams (N.C. Ct. App. 1977)
State v. Edwards (N.C. Ct. App. 1975)
State v. Rigsbee (N.C. 1974)
State v. Cameron (N.C. 1973)
State v. Robinson (N.C. 1973)
State v. Cameron (N.C. Ct. App. 1972)
State v. Cradle (N.C. 1972)
State v. Moffitt (N.C. Ct. App. 1971)
State v. Fowler (N.C. Ct. App. 1968)
State v. Morrison (N.C. Ct. App. 1973)
State v. Privette (N.C. Ct. App. 1973)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have carefully examined the defendant’s assignments of error and find them without merit. The motion for continuance was addressed to the discretion of the court. The motion for a directed verdict was properly denied. The court’s charge presented fairly the burden the law required the State to carry before the jury could render a verdict of guilty on either of the charges. Error in the trial or reason why the verdict and judgment should be disturbed are not disclosed.

No error.

Moore, J., not sitting.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.