State v. Day

Supreme Court of North Carolina
State v. Day, 268 N.C. 464 (N.C. 1966)
150 S.E.2d 863; 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1235

State v. Day

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Each of the assignments of error brought forward in defendants’ brief has been carefully considered. Defendants’ contention in respect of each assignment is fully considered *466and answered in the Attorney General’s brief. Suffice to say, none of the assignments discloses prejudicial error or presents a question of sufficient merit to require or warrant discussion. The jury, on un-contradicted evidence, found the alleged (serious and despicable) crime was committed; and, on conflicting evidence, found said crime was committed by these defendants.

No error.

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE v. EDWARD BERNARD DAY, EUGENE DAVIS, JOSEPH WILLIAM FREELOW, and LEWIS STANLEY
Status
Published