Connor v. Conrad
Connor v. Conrad
Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff and defendant introduced evidence. Defendant assigns as error the denial of his motion for judgment of compulsory nonsuit entered at the close of all the evidence. A study
The jury, under application of settled principles of law, resolved the issues of fact against the defendant. While the appellant’s brief presents contentions involving fine distinctions and close differentiations, a careful examination of all of his assignments of error discloses no question or feature requiring extended discussion. Neither reversible nor prejudicial error has been made to appear. The verdict and judgment below will be upheld.
No error.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- GEORGE C. CONNOR, JR. v. DONALD WILLIAM CONRAD
- Status
- Published