Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /North Carolina /Cases /Supreme Court of North Carolina /

1966

479 Supreme Court of North Carolina opinions from 1966.

  • Firemen's Mutual Insurance v. High Point Sprinkler Co. 146 S.E.2d 53, (N.C. 1966)
  • State v. Bridges 146 S.E.2d 107, (N.C. 1966)
  • Teague v. Teague 146 S.E.2d 87, (N.C. 1966)
  • Wright v. Vaden 146 S.E.2d 31, (N.C. 1966)
  • Hinkle v. Hinkle 146 S.E.2d 73, (N.C. 1966)
  • Beanblossom v. Thomas 146 S.E.2d 36, (N.C. 1966)
  • Hunt v. Carolina Truck Supplies, Inc. 146 S.E.2d 84, (N.C. 1966)
  • Hatchell v. Cooper 146 S.E.2d 62, (N.C. 1966)
  • Keith v. United Cities Gas Company 146 S.E.2d 7, (N.C. 1966)
  • Drumwright v. Wood 146 S.E.2d 1, (N.C. 1966)
  • McLeod v. McLeod 146 S.E.2d 65, (N.C. 1966)
  • Coulter v. Capitol Finance Company 146 S.E.2d 97, (N.C. 1966)
  • Nance v. Parks 146 S.E.2d 24, (N.C. 1966)
  • Wachovia B. & T. Co. v. American Bank. Ins. Co. of Fla. 146 S.E.2d 79, (N.C. 1966)
  • Swann v. United Cities Gas Co. 146 S.E.2d 17, (N.C. 1966)
  • Bingham v. Lee 146 S.E.2d 19, (N.C. 1966)
  • Guilford Realty & Insurance v. Blythe Bros. 145 S.E.2d 838, (N.C. 1966)
  • Banner v. North Carolina National Bank 146 S.E.2d 89, (N.C. 1966)
  • State v. Strouth 145 S.E.2d 852, (N.C. 1966)
  • State ex rel. Glamorgan Pipe & Foundry Co. v. Benfield 145 S.E.2d 912, (N.C. 1966)
  • Sink v. Schafer 145 S.E.2d 860, (N.C. 1966)
  • Vernon v. Reheis 145 S.E.2d 914, (N.C. 1966)
  • Stadler Country Hams, Inc. v. Scott 145 S.E.2d 837, (N.C. 1966)
  • State v. Coleman 146 S.E.2d 30, (N.C. 1966)
  • State v. Richmond 145 S.E.2d 915, (N.C. 1966)
  • Garner ex rel. Garner v. Whitley 145 S.E.2d 910, (N.C. 1966)
  • State v. White 145 S.E.2d 872, (N.C. 1966)
  • McIver v. Poteat 146 S.E.2d 18, (N.C. 1966)
  • State v. Burgess 145 S.E.2d 905, (N.C. 1966)
« Prev 1 … 8 9 10 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑