Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1967

State v. Love

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided March 22, 1967 · Per Curiam

153 S.E.2d 381; 269 N.C. 691; 1967 N.C. LEXIS 1134 (South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

10 later published cases cite this decision.

State v. Miller (N.C. 1975)
State v. Barrow (N.C. Ct. App. 1969)
State v. Sparrow (N.C. 1970)
State v. Carnes (N.C. Ct. App. 1973)
State v. Morgan (N.C. Ct. App. 1971)
State v. Barrow (N.C. 1970)
State v. Barrow (N.C. 1970)
State v. Hardee (N.C. Ct. App. 1969)
State v. Clayton (N.C. 1968)
State v. Spence (N.C. 1967)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellant’s first assignment of error challenges the Court’s refusal to sequester the witnesses upon the appellant’s motion. The refusal was in the Court’s discretion and not reviewable. State v. Spencer, 239 N.C. 604, 80 S.E. 2d 670. Another assignment involved the admissibility of evidence. Any error in this respect was cured by the failure to place in the record the excluded evidence so the Court could determine its materiality. In one instance evidence of the same import was admitted without objection.

The record does not disclose any reason why the verdict and judgment should be disturbed.

No error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.