State v. Puryear
State v. Puryear
230 S.E.2d 678; 291 N.C. 325; 1976 N.C. LEXIS 991
(South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)
State v. Puryear
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Earl V. PURYEAR.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Ragsdale, Liggett & Cheshire, for defendant.
Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen., Thomas B. Wood, Asst. Atty. Gen., for State.
Petition by defendant for discretionary review under GS 7A-31, 30 N.C.App. 719, 228 S.E.2d 536. Denied. Motion of the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question. Allowed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.