Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1976

State v. Watlington

State v. Watlington
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided September 1, 1976
228 S.E.2d 457; 290 N.C. 666; 1976 N.C. LEXIS 1163 (South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

State v. Watlington

Opinion

228 S.E.2d 457 (1976)
290 N.C. 666

STATE of North Carolina
v.
Joyce Marie WATLINGTON.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 1, 1976.

A. Carl Penney, for defendant.

Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen., Norma S. Harrell, Associate Atty., for the State.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under GS 7A-31, N.C.App., 226 S.E.2d 186. Denied. Motion of the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of a substantial constitutional question. Allowed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑