State v. Riddick
State v. Riddick
247 S.E.2d 234; 293 N.C. 261
(South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)
State v. Riddick
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Herman Leroy RIDDICK, Jr.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
Inasmuch as defendant did not assign as error on appeal the failure of the trial judge to place the burden of proving the absence of heat of passion or the absence of self-defense on the state, see State v. Riddick, 291 N.C. 399, 230 S.E.2d 506 (1976), he has waived his right now to complain about such errors. Hankerson v. North Carolina, 423 U.S. 233, 97 S.Ct. 2339, 53 L.Ed.2d 306, 316, n. 8 (1977). Now, therefore, it is ORDERED by the Court in Conference that defendant's motion for reconsideration be and it is hereby denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.