Batiste v. American Home Products Corp.
Batiste v. American Home Products Corp.
233 S.E.2d 921; 292 N.C. 466; 1977 N.C. LEXIS 1110
(South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
13 later published cases cite this decision.
- Rite Aid Corp. v. Levy-Gray (Md. 2006)
- In re TMJ Implants Products Liability Litigation (D. Minn. 1995)
- Rite Aid Corp. v. Levy-Gray (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2005)
- In re Rezulin Products Liability Litigation (District Court, S.D. New York 2001)
- Parks v. Alteon, Inc. (District Court, M.D. North Carolina 2001)
- Brooks v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (N.C. Ct. App. 2000)
- Griffith v. Blatt (Or. Ct. App. 1999)
- Ferguson v. Williams (N.C. Ct. App. 1991)
- Ferguson v. Williams (N.C. Ct. App. 1988)
- Perry v. Aycock (N.C. Ct. App. 1984)
- Cameron v. New Hanover Memorial Hospital, Inc. (N.C. Ct. App. 1982)
- Wray v. Hughes (N.C. Ct. App. 1980)
- Wood v. J. P. Stevens & Co. (N.C. Ct. App. 1978)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Alice M. BATISTE
v.
AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, et al.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Mraz, Aycock, Casstevens & Davis, for plaintiff.
Golding, Crews, Meekins, Gordon & Gray (Ritchie), Hartsell, Hartsell & Mills (Pikes Drug Store), for defendants.
Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under GS 7A-31. 32 N.C.App. 1, 231 S.E.2d 269. Denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.