Lynch v. Hazelwood
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re the Appeal of K-Mart Corp. (N.C. 1987)
- State v. Moore (N.C. 1986)
- Vick v. Davis (N.C. 1986)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Tina Darlene LYNCH
v.
Harry Aldene HAZELWOOD.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Pollock, Fullenwider, Cunningham & Patterson by Bruce T. Cunningham, Jr., Southern Pines, for plaintiff-appellant.
Staton, Perkinson, West & Doster by Norman C. Post, Jr., Sanford, for defendant-appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The Court is evenly divided. Under these circumstances, following the uniform practice of this Court and the ancient rule of praesumitur pro negante, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed, not as precedent but as the decision in this case. Durham v. R.R., 113 N.C. 240, 18 S.E. 208 (1893); Reg. v. Millis, 8 Eng.Rep. 844 (1844).
AFFIRMED.
VAUGHN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.