State v. Roland
State v. Roland
368 S.E.2d 385
(South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)
State v. Roland
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Donald Joseph ROLAND.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
*386 Lacy H. Thornburg, Atty. Gen. by Norma S. Harrell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for the State.
Lipsitz, Green, Fahringer, Roll, Schuller & James, pro hac vice. by Paul J. Cambria, Jr., Herbert L. Greenman, Buffalo, and James, McElroy & Diehl by Edward T. Hinson, Jr., Charlotte, for defendant-appellant.
North Carolina Civil Liberties Legal Foundation by William G. Simpson, Jr., Raleigh, and Smith, Helms, Mulliss & Moore by William Sam Byassee and Jon Berkelhammer, Greensboro, amicus curiae.
PER CURIAM.
The decision of the Court of Appeals is
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.