Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1993

Haywood v. Haywood

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided February 12, 1993 · No. 181A92 · Whichard, Parker

425 S.E.2d 696; 333 N.C. 342; 1993 N.C. LEXIS 51 (South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

17 later published cases cite this decision.

Friend-Novorska v. Novorska (N.C. Ct. App. 1998)
Rice v. Rice (N.C. Ct. App. 2003)
Munn v. Munn (N.C. Ct. App. 1993)
Smith v. Smith (N.C. Ct. App. 1993)
Washington v. Cline (N.C. Ct. App. 2014)
Washington v. Cline (N.C. Ct. App. 2013)
Romulus v. Romulus (N.C. Ct. App. 2011)
Wall v. Wall (N.C. Ct. App. 2000)
Khajanchi v. Khajanchi (N.C. Ct. App. 2000)
Wells v. Wells (N.C. Ct. App. 1999)
Simmons v. Simmons (Conn. 1998)
Collins v. Collins (N.C. Ct. App. 1997)
In re Marriage of Denton (Or. Ct. App. 1996)
Loving v. Loving (N.C. Ct. App. 1995)
Johnson v. Johnson (N.C. Ct. App. 1994)
Minter v. Minter (N.C. Ct. App. 1993)
Edwards v. Edwards (N.C. Ct. App. 1993)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant’s petition for discretionary review as to additional issues having been denied on 24 June 1992, our review is limited solely to the issues raised in the dissent. As to each such issue, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed for the reasons stated in the dissent by Judge Wynn, 106 N.C. App. at 101, 415 S.E.2d at 571. The case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this holding.

REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

Justices WHICHARD and PARKER did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.