Peal Ex Rel. Peal v. Smith
Peal Ex Rel. Peal v. Smith
457 S.E.2d 599; 340 N.C. 352; 1995 N.C. LEXIS 255
(South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Keith v. Health-Pro Home Care Servs. (N.C. Ct. App. 2020)
- Killian v. Caza Drilling, Inc. (Wyo. 2006)
- Heidi Schuyleman v. Brian Jeffrey Smith (Wash. Ct. App. 2019)
- Estate of Mullis Ex Rel. Dixon v. Monroe Oil Co. (N.C. 1998)
- Cannizzaro v. Marinyak (Conn. 2014)
- Lev v. Beverly Enterprises-Massachusetts, Inc. (Mass. App. Ct. 2009)
- Lumsden Ex Rel. Estate of Lumsden v. United States (District Court, E.D. North Carolina 2008)
- Hall v. Toreros, II, Inc. (N.C. Ct. App. 2006)
- Thompson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (N.C. Ct. App. 2000)
- Norris v. Zambito (N.C. Ct. App. 1999)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Justice Orr recused and took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See Nesbit v. Howard, 333 N.C. 782, 429 S.E.2d 730 (1993).
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.