Boomer v. Caraway

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Boomer v. Caraway, 342 N.C. 186 (N.C. 1995)
463 S.E.2d 230; 1995 N.C. LEXIS 543

Boomer v. Caraway

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

In affirming summary judgment for the defendant, the Court of Appeals said that it could not find defendant was estopped from asserting the statute of limitation defense “[w]ithout evidence that defendant had an affirmative duty to seek judicial approval of the settlement.” Boomer v. Caraway, 116 N.C. App. 723, 726, 449 S.E.2d 215, 218 (1994). We disavow this language to the extent that it suggests *187that the question of who has the duty to seek judicial approval of a settlement is one involving the presentation of evidence rather than a question of law. In all other respects, we agree with the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
GERTIE MAE BOOMER, Administratrix of the Estate op Joyce Boomer Forbes v. SHERWOOD WATSON CARAWAY
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published