Crisp v. Crisp
Crisp v. Crisp
347 N.C. 659; 496 S.E.2d 379; 1998 N.C. LEXIS 102
Crisp v. Crisp
Opinion of the Court
As to the issue presented by defendant’s appeal based on the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. As to the additional issues presented by this Court’s having allowed plaintiff’s petition for a writ of certiorari, we conclude that certiorari was improvidently allowed.
AFFIRMED IN PART; CERTIORARI IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.