Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1999

Caudill v. Dellinger

Caudill v. Dellinger
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided March 4, 1999 · Per Curiam
511 S.E.2d 304; 350 N.C. 89; 1999 N.C. LEXIS 50 (South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)
Caudill v. Dellinger

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On defendant Dellinger’s appeal, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in the majority opinion by Judge Horton. Defendant’s petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.

AFFIRMED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.