Piazza v. Little
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Rolf Kamp v. Empire Fire and Marine Insuran (4th Cir. 2014)
- Hlasnick v. Federated Mutual Insurance (N.C. Ct. App. 2000)
- Patrick v. Allstate Ins. (N.C. 1999)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The sole issue in this case is whether N.C.G.S. § 20-279.21(b)(4) requires an excess personal liability policy to provide underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage where such coverage is expressly excluded by the terms of the policy. Pursuant to the Court’s decision in Progressive Am. Ins. Co. v. Vasquez, 350 N.C. 386, 515 S.E.2d 8 (1999), it does not.
Under the decision in Progressive, an excess liability policy such as the one at issue in this case is not a “motor vehicle liability policy”
Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals affirming the trial court’s entry of summary judgment for plaintiff is reversed. This case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Superior Court, Pitt County for entry of summary judgment for unnamed defendant Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.