Woody v. Thomasville Upholstery Inc.
Woody v. Thomasville Upholstery Inc.
562 S.E.2d 422; 355 N.C. 483
(South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
16 later published cases cite this decision.
- Gagnon v. Duke University (North Carolina Industrial Commission 2007)
- Bursell v. Gen. Elec. Co. (North Carolina Industrial Commission 2004)
- Bursell v. General Electric Co. (N.C. Ct. App. 2005)
- Corbin v. Xerox Corp. (North Carolina Industrial Commission 2008)
- Carlton v. N.C. Deparment of Crime Control (North Carolina Industrial Commission 2005)
- Lane v. American National Can Company (North Carolina Industrial Commission 2005)
- Knight v. Abbott Lab. (North Carolina Industrial Commission 2005)
- McClelland v. New Hanover Cty. Sheriff's Dept. (North Carolina Industrial Commission 2004)
- Knight v. Abbott Laboratories (N.C. Ct. App. 2003)
- Smith-Price v. Charter Pines Behavioral Center (N.C. Ct. App. 2003)
- Neely v. Lucent Technologies, Inc. (North Carolina Industrial Commission 2003)
- Boyd v. First Tennessee Nat. Corp. (North Carolina Industrial Commission 2003)
- Robbins v. Wake County Board of Education (N.C. Ct. App. 2002)
- Pitillo v. NC DEPT. OF ENV. HEALTH (N.C. Ct. App. 2002)
- Pitillo v. N.C. Department of Environmental Health & Natural Resources (N.C. Ct. App. 2002)
- Turner v. Bennett College (North Carolina Industrial Commission 2003)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Beatrice WOODY, Employee
v.
THOMASVILLE UPHOLSTERY INCORPORATED, Employer,
Self-Insured (Helsman-Management Services, Inc., Servicing Agent).
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Mary F. Pyron, Hickory, for plaintiff-appellee.
Morris York Williams Surles & Barringer, LLP by Thomas E. Williams and Stephen Kushner, Charlotte; and Orbock Bowden Ruark & Dillard by Maureen S. Orbock and Devin F. Thomas, Winston-Salem, for defendant-appellant.
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.
REVERSED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.