Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2002

Crawford v. COMMERCIAL UNION MIDWEST INS. COM.

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided December 20, 2002 · Per Curiam

572 S.E.2d 781; 356 N.C. 609; 2002 N.C. LEXIS 1254 (South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

23 later published cases cite this decision.

Weaver v. Sheppa (N.C. 2008)
Formyduval v. Britt (N.C. 2007)
State v. Everett (N.C. 2007)
Wornstaff v. Wornstaff (N.C. 2007)
Williams v. Vonderau (N.C. 2007)
State v. Everett (N.C. 2007)
Formyduval v. Britt (N.C. 2007)
Wornstaff v. Wornstaff (N.C. 2007)
Williams v. Vonderau (N.C. 2007)
State v. Harrison (N.C. 2006)
State v. Renfro (N.C. 2006)
Barham v. Hawk (N.C. 2006)
State v. Bauberger (N.C. 2006)
Barham v. Hawk (N.C. 2006)
State v. Harrison (N.C. 2006)
State v. Renfro (N.C. 2006)
State v. Bauberger (N.C. 2006)
Currituck Associates-Residential Partnership v. Hollowell (N.C. 2005)
Currituck Associates-Residential Partnership v. Hollowell (N.C. 2005)
BEATENHEAD v. Lincoln County (N.C. 2004)
State v. Foster (N.C. 2004)
State v. Holden (N.C. 2004)
State v. Alston (N.C. 2004)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Justice BUTTERFIELD did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court were equally divided, with three members voting to affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals and three members voting to reverse. Therefore, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See Reese v. Barbee, 350 N.C. 60, 510 S.E.2d 374 (1999); Nesbit v. Howard, 333 N.C. 782, 429 S.E.2d 730 (1993).

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.