Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2003

State v. Finney

State v. Finney
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided August 21, 2003 · Brady
357 N.C. 453; 586 S.E.2d 273; 2003 N.C. LEXIS 1064
State v. Finney

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Attorney General’s motion to dismiss defendant’s appeal is allowed.

On its own motion, the Court allows discretionary review as to the following issues:

1. Whether the trial court erred in admitting the hearsay testimony of Detective Haiper as to statements allegedly made to him by the unavailable complainant.
2. Whether the trial court erred in not allowing the defendant to introduce the prior sworn testimony of the unavailable complainant.
3. Whether the trial court erred in its instruction on first-degree rape.

By order of the Court in Conference, this 21st day of August, 2003.

Brady, J. For the Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.