Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2006

Barham v. Hawk

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided March 3, 2006 · Per Curiam

625 S.E.2d 778; 360 N.C. 358; 2006 N.C. LEXIS 18 (South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

14 later published cases cite this decision.

Heatherly v. State (N.C. 2009)
Hall v. TOREROS II, INC. (N.C. 2009)
Rodriguez-Carias v. Nelson's Auto Salvage & Towing Service (N.C. 2009)
Heatherly v. State (N.C. 2009)
State v. Caple (N.C. 2008)
State v. Caple (N.C. 2008)
Masood v. Erwin Oil Co. (N.C. 2007)
Ripellino v. North Carolina School Boards Ass'n (N.C. 2007)
Ripellino v. Nc School Boards Ass'n (N.C. 2007)
Masood v. Erwin Oil Co. (N.C. 2007)
Katy v. Capriola (N.C. Ct. App. 2013)
Day v. Brant (N.C. Ct. App. 2012)
Day v. Brant (N.C. Ct. App. 2010)
Williams v. Kane (N.C. Ct. App. 2009)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Justice TIMMONS-GOODSON took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See Crawford v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co., 356 N.C. 609, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002); Robinson v. Byrd, 356 N.C. 608, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002).

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.