Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2006

In re C.L.C.

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided May 5, 2006 · Consideration, Goodson, Timmons

360 N.C. 475; 628 S.E.2d 760; 2006 N.C. LEXIS 37

Cases that cite this one

58 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

In re Z.L.W. (N.C. 2019)
In re A.J.K. (N.C. Ct. App. 2019)
In re A.G. (N.C. Ct. App. 2017)
In re M.M. (N.C. Ct. App. 2013)
In re Ds (N.C. 2010)
In re FGJ (N.C. Ct. App. 2009)
In the Matter of Anj-H. (N.C. Ct. App. 2008)
In the Matter of Mkb (N.C. Ct. App. 2008)
In the Matter of Djg (N.C. Ct. App. 2007)
In re CLK (N.C. Ct. App. 2007)
In re Sb (N.C. Ct. App. 2007)
In re C.L.K. (N.C. Ct. App. 2007)
In the D.J.G. (N.C. Ct. App. 2007)
In re TM (N.C. Ct. App. 2006)
In re HT (N.C. Ct. App. 2006)
In re H.T. (N.C. Ct. App. 2006)
In re T.M. (N.C. Ct. App. 2006)
In re L.C. (N.C. 2025)
In re: L.C. (N.C. Ct. App. 2024)
In re A.E., J.V., E.V., and A.V. (N.C. 2021)
In re A.E. (N.C. 2021)
In re A.C. (N.C. 2021)
In re: T.H. & M.H. (N.C. Ct. App. 2019)
In re T.N.H. (N.C. 2019)
Catawba County ex rel. Rackley v. Loggins (N.C. 2017)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

As to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, we affirm the majority decision of the Court of Appeals. We conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.

AFFIRMED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Justice TIMMONS-GOODSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.