Terasaka v. AT&T
Terasaka v. AT&T
360 N.C. 584; 634 S.E.2d 888; 2006 N.C. LEXIS 1041
Opinion of the Court
As to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, we affirm the majority decision of the Court of Appeals. We conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.
AFFIRMED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.