Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2008

State v. Duncan

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided December 12, 2008 · Per Curiam

669 S.E.2d 738; 362 N.C. 665; 2008 N.C. LEXIS 995 (South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

State v. Potter (N.C. Ct. App. 2009)
State v. Copenhaver (N.C. Ct. App. 2025)
State v. Streater (N.C. Ct. App. 2009)
State v. Streater (N.C. Ct. App. 2009)
State v. Keaton (N.C. Ct. App. 2009)
Crawford v. Mintz (N.C. 2008)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of the Court of Appeals, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and that court is instructed to reinstate the judgment of the trial court. Discretionary review of the additional issue was improvidently allowed. Defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is dismissed without prejudice to his right to raise that issue by filing a motion for appropriate relief in the superior court.

REVERSED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.