Huber Engineered Woods, LLC v. Canal Insurance Company
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc. v. L.H. Bolduc Co. (Minn. 2013)
- Pro Con, Inc. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co. (District Court, D. Maine 2011)
- GEICO Casualty Company v. Hollandsworth (District Court, W.D. Missouri 2019)
- National Union Fire Insurance v. Greenwich Insurance (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- National Union Fire Insurance v. Greenwich Insurance (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals holding that defendant has a duty to defend plaintiff in the underlying action at issue. We affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals vacating the portion of the trial court’s order of summary judgment that found defendant has a duty to indemnify plaintiff in the underlying action. This case is re *414 manded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Superior Court, Mecklenburg County, for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.