Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2010

In re H.N.D.

In re H.N.D.
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided December 20, 2010
364 N.C. 597; 704 S.E.2d 510; 2010 N.C. LEXIS 1076

In re H.N.D.

Opinion of the Court

PER-CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.

REVERSED.

*598PENNY CUMMINGS v. AGNES ORTEGA, M.D. and WOMEN’S HEALTH CARE SPECIALISTS

) ) ) ) ) )

ORDER

No. 417P10

The defendant’s Petition for Discretionary Review is allowed on the following issue only: “Did the trial court err by relying on evidence contained within juror affidavits to grant plaintiff a new trial?”

By order of the Court in Conference, this 15th day of December, 2010.

Hudson. J.

For the Court

*599[[Image here]]

*600[[Image here]]

*601[[Image here]]

*602[[Image here]]

*603[[Image here]]

*604[[Image here]]

*605[[Image here]]

*606[[Image here]]

*607[[Image here]]

*608[[Image here]]

*609[[Image here]]

*610[[Image here]]

*611[[Image here]]

*612[[Image here]]

*613[[Image here]]

*614[[Image here]]

*615[[Image here]]

*616[[Image here]]

*617[[Image here]]

*618[[Image here]]

*619[[Image here]]

*620[[Image here]]

*621[[Image here]]

*622[[Image here]]

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.