State v. Pizano-Trejo

Supreme Court of North Carolina
State v. Pizano-Trejo, 367 N.C. 111 (N.C. 2013)
748 S.E.2d 144; 2013 WL 5526291; 2013 N.C. LEXIS 993
Per Curiam

State v. Pizano-Trejo

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Justice BEASLEY took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Goldston v. State, 364 N.C. 416, 700 S.E.2d 223 (2010).

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
State of North Carolina v. Francisco Javier Pizano-Trejo
Status
Published