Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2013

State v. Pizano-Trejo

State v. Pizano-Trejo
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided October 4, 2013 · Per Curiam
367 N.C. 111; 748 S.E.2d 144; 2013 WL 5526291; 2013 N.C. LEXIS 993

State v. Pizano-Trejo

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Justice BEASLEY took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Goldston v. State, 364 N.C. 416, 700 S.E.2d 223 (2010).

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.