State v. Hurt

Supreme Court of North Carolina June 27, 2013

State v. Hurt, 367 N.C. 80 (N.C. 2013)

743 S.E.2d 173; 2013 WL 3238797; 2013 N.C. LEXIS 657

Parker, Hudson, Beasley

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in State v. Ortiz-Zape,_N.C._,_, _ S.E.2d_,_(2013), the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. The case is remanded for consideration of the remaining issues on appeal.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Dissenting Opinion

Chief Justice PARKER and Justice HUDSON

dissent for the reasons stated in Justice Hudson’s dissenting opinions in State v. Ortiz-Zape, _N.C. _, _ S.E.2d_ (2013) (329PA11) and State v. Brewington,__N.C._,_S.E.2d_(2013) (235PA10).

Justice BEASLEY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Reference

Full Case Name: State of North Carolina v. David Franklin Hurt
Cited By: 2 cases
Status: Published