State v. Hough

Supreme Court of North Carolina
State v. Hough, 367 N.C. 79 (N.C. 2013)
743 S.E.2d 174; 2013 WL 3325154; 2013 N.C. LEXIS 659
Per Curiam

State v. Hough

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Justice JACKSON took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary, 365 N.C. 305, 716 S.E.2d 849 (2011); Goldston v. State, 364 N.C. 416, 700 S.E.2d 223 (2010).

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. KERRY McKINLEY HOUGH
Status
Published