Baysden v. State, 366 NC 370

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Baysden v. State, 366 NC 370, 366 N.C. 370 (N.C. 2013)
736 S.E.2d 173; 2013 N.C. LEXIS 53
Per Curiam

Baysden v. State, 366 NC 370

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Justice BEASLEY took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court .are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Goldston v. State, 364 N.C. 416, 700 S.E.2d 223 (2010); Formyduval v. Britt, 361 N.C. 215, 639 S.E.2d 443 (2007); Pitts v. Am. Sec. Ins. Co., 356 N.C. 292, 569 S.E.2d 647 (2002).

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Walter Sutton Baysden v. State of North Carolina
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published