Gonzalez v. Worrell
Gonzalez v. Worrell
366 N.C. 501; 739 S.E.2d 552; 2013 WL 1502947; 2013 N.C. LEXIS 338
Gonzalez v. Worrell
Opinion of the Court
Justice BEASLEY took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary, 365 N.C. 305, 716 S.E.2d 849 (2011); Goldston v. State, 364 N.C. 416, 700 S.E.2d 223 (2010).
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.