Gonzalez v. Worrell

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Gonzalez v. Worrell, 366 N.C. 501 (N.C. 2013)
739 S.E.2d 552; 2013 WL 1502947; 2013 N.C. LEXIS 338

Gonzalez v. Worrell

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Justice BEASLEY took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary, 365 N.C. 305, 716 S.E.2d 849 (2011); Goldston v. State, 364 N.C. 416, 700 S.E.2d 223 (2010).

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
JOSE CLEMENTE HERNANDEZ GONZALEZ, Employee v. JIMMY WORRELL d/b/a WORRELL CONSTRUCTION, NONINSURED, and PATRICK LAMM AND CO., LLC, Employer, TRAVELERS INDEMNITY CO., BUILDERS MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., SCOTT INSURANCE AGENCY, SWISS REINSURANCE COMPANY, and CINCINNATI INSURANCE CO., Carriers
Status
Published