Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2014

Falk v. Mae

Falk v. Mae
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided April 10, 2014 · Beaslev
367 N.C. 487; 769 S.E.2d 625

Falk v. Mae

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Notice of Appeal filed by defendant and third-party plaintiff (Fannie Mae) and defendant (GlassRatner Management & Realty Advisors, *488LLC) is RETAINED. Their Petition for Discretionary Review is ALLOWED. Plaintiff and third-party defendant’s (Michael A. Falk) Motion to Dismiss Appeal is DENIED.

By order of the Court in Conference, this the 10th day of April 2014.

In addition, the parties are directed to address the applicability, if any, of N.C.G.S. § 45-37(b) (1991) and N.C.G.S. § 45-37(b) (2011) to this case.

s/Beaslev. J.

For the Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑