In re R.R.N.
In re R.R.N.
367 N.C. 490; 769 S.E.2d 628; 2014 N.C. LEXIS 759; 2014 WL 8277818
In re R.R.N.
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Petitioner’s petition for discretionary review is allowed as to the following issue: “Whether the Court of Appeals erred in its interpretation of N.C.G.S. § 7B-101(3) regarding the definition of a ‘caretaker.’ ” Respondent’s motion to dismiss is denied, petitioner’s motion for leave to file verification is allowed, and petitioner’s petition for writ of supersedeas is allowed.
For the Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.