Falk v. Mae
Falk v. Mae
367 N.C. 499
Falk v. Mae
Opinion of the Court
1. Def and Third Party Plaintiff (Fannie Mae) and Def’s (GlassRatner Management & Realty Advisors', LLC) NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA12-764)
2. Def and Third Party Plaintiff (Fannie Mae) and Def’s (GlassRatner) PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31
3. Pit and Third Party Def’s (Michael A. Falk) Motion to Dismiss Appeal
1. Retained by Special Order
2. Allowed by Special Order
3. Denied by Special Order
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.