Piro v. McKeever
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Piro v. McKeever, 369 N.C. 291 (N.C. 2016)
794 S.E.2d 501; 2016 N.C. LEXIS 1132
Ervin, Per Curiam
Piro v. McKeever
Opinion
■ In this case we consider whether plaintiff’s complaint sufficiently alleged claims for negligent infliction of emotional distress and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Because the members of the Court are equally divided as to both issues, the holding of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands affirmed without precedential value. See, e.g., State v. Long, 365 N.C. 5, 705 S.E.2d 735 (2011) (per curiam); State v. Greene, 298 N.C. 268, 258 S.E.2d 71 (1979) (per curiam).
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- MICHAEL C. PIRO v. REBECCA HADDEN McKEEVER, L.C.S.W.; CYNTHIA L. SAPP, Ph.D.; KAREN BARRY, M.F.T., LMFT; And DAVIDSON COUNSELING ASSOCIATES
- Cited By
- 20 cases
- Status
- Published