Piro v. McKeever
Piro v. McKeever
369 N.C. 291; 794 S.E.2d 501; 2016 N.C. LEXIS 1132
Piro v. McKeever
Opinion
■ In this case we consider whether plaintiff’s complaint sufficiently alleged claims for negligent infliction of emotional distress and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Because the members of the Court are equally divided as to both issues, the holding of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands affirmed without precedential value. See, e.g., State v. Long, 365 N.C. 5, 705 S.E.2d 735 (2011) (per curiam); State v. Greene, 298 N.C. 268, 258 S.E.2d 71 (1979) (per curiam).
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.