State v. McPhaul

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. McPhaul

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

No. 421PA17

Filed 21 September 2018 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

v. JUAN FORONTE McPHAUL

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 808 S.E.2d 294 (2017), finding no prejudicial error in part and vacating in part judgments entered on 2 October 2015 by Judge James M. Webb in Superior Court, Hoke County. On 9 May 2018, the Supreme Court allowed the State’s conditional petition for discretionary review as to additional issues. Heard in the Supreme Court on 28 August 2018.

Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by William P. Hart, Jr., Assistant Attorney

General, for the State-appellant/appellee.

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, by Amanda S. Zimmer, Assistant Appellate

Defender, for defendant-appellant/appellee.

Rayburn Cooper & Durham, P.A., by James B. Gatehouse; and Davis Polk &

Wardwell LLP, by Sharon Katz, pro hac vice, and Matthew R. Brock, pro hac

vice, for Professor Brandon L. Garrett and twenty-five other named scholars

representing the fields of law, forensic science, medicine, and statistics, amici

curiae.

PER CURIAM.

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Reference

Status
Published
Syllabus
Whether the trial court committed prejudicial error in admitting testimony from the State's expert in fingerprint identification that tied defendant to the crimes for which he was convicted.