State v. Phachoumphone

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Phachoumphone

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

No. 65PA18

Filed 29 March 2019 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

v. NOUI PHACHOUMPHONE

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 810 S.E.2d 748 (2018), finding no prejudicial error after appeal from judgments entered on 22 September 2016 by Judge Eric L. Levinson in Superior Court, Cleveland County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 4 March 2019.

Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Elizabeth Guzman, Assistant Attorney

General, for the State.

William D. Spence for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Justice DAVIS did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Reference

Status
Published
Syllabus
Whether the State presented sufficient evidence to survive defendant's motions to dismiss the charges for which he was convicted whether the trial court committed prejudicial error in allowing the alleged child victim to testify remotely or in not intervening ex mero motu in certain closing arguments by the prosecutor.