State v. Ryan
State v. Ryan
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
No. 366A10
Filed 27 September 2019 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
v. MICHAEL PATRICK RYAN
Appeal pursuant to an order of this Court allowing review of an order granting defendant’s motion for appropriate relief entered on 7 February 2017 by Judge W. Erwin Spainhour in Superior Court, Gaston County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 27 August 2019.
Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Mary Carla Babb, Assistant Attorney
General, for the State.
William F. W. Massengale and Marilyn G. Ozer, for defendant-appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Justice ERVIN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Superior Court, Gaston County. Accordingly, the decision of the Superior Court, Gaston County is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See State v. Woodruff, 307 N.C. 264, 297 S.E.2d 382 (1982).
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Appeal from a trial court order granting defendant's motion for appropriate relief, vacating defendant's convictions and sentence of death, and ordering a new trial whether the trial court erred in granting the motion for appropriate relief based upon its conclusion that defendant's counsel was ineffective for failing to call or consult with various available witnesses in a capital proceeding.