Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
North Dakota Supreme Court, 1892

Northern Pacific Railroad v. Strong

Northern Pacific Railroad v. Strong
North Dakota Supreme Court · Decided January 12, 1892 · Action, Any, Bartholomew, Been, Corliss, Counsel, Hearing, McConnell, Places, Request, Sixth, Third, Wallin, Winchester
2 N.D. 395; 51 N.W. 787; 1892 N.D. LEXIS 29

Northern Pacific Railroad v. Strong

Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Winchester, J.

Following the case of Bailroad Co. v. Barnes, ante (decided at this term), the judgment of the district court is reversed.

McConnell, J., concurs. Corliss, C. J., dissents. *396Bartholomew and Wallin, JJ., having been of counsel, did not sit on the hearing of the above-entitled action, nor take any part in the opinion; Judge Winchester, of the sixth judicial district, and Judge McConnell, of the third judicial district, sitting by request in their places.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑