Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
North Dakota Supreme Court, 1892

Northern Pacific Railroad v. Brewer

Northern Pacific Railroad v. Brewer
North Dakota Supreme Court · Decided January 12, 1892 · Action, Any, Bartholomew, Been, Corliss, Counsel, Hearing, McConnell, Places, Request, Sixth, Third, Wallin, Winchester
2 N.D. 396; 51 N.W. 787; 1892 N.D. LEXIS 28

Northern Pacific Railroad v. Brewer

Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Winchester, J.

Following the case of Railroad Co. v. Barnes, ante (decided at this term,) the judgment of the district court is reversed.

McConnell, J., concurs. Corliss, C. J., dissents. Bartholomew and Wallin, JJ., having been of counsel, did not sit on the hearing of the above-entitled action, nor take any part in the opinion; Judge Winchester, of the sixth judicial district, and Judge McConnell, of the third judicial district, sitting by request in their places.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑